Video Editor SDK Performance Benchmark: Top SDKs Compared for 2025
Performance determines whether a mobile editor feels smooth or sluggish. Slow exports, laggy previews, or dropped frames quickly frustrate users.
This benchmark looks at how five major SDKs perform: Banuba, Meishe, BytePlus, Agora, and Perfect Corp. We compare export times, preview FPS, hardware usage, and behavior on different device tiers.
All data is taken from documentation and verifiable benchmarks.
[navigation]
TL;DR
Banuba consistently delivers the most balanced performance across export speed, real-time FPS, AR effects, and device coverage.
Meishe stays reliable at 1080p but doesn’t scale as broadly.
BytePlus supports high-end formats but its performance varies by device class.
Agora is built for live workflows rather than full editing pipelines.
Perfect Corp focuses on high-fidelity beauty AR and depends more heavily on strong hardware.
1. Export Times vs. Resolution (720p → 4K)
Banuba
Banuba shows the most efficient high-resolution export performance in the comparison. In an 8-second near-4K test, Banuba exported in ~3 seconds, outperforming Meishe’s 5 seconds, which illustrates strong optimization around hardware encoders. Banuba also scales sensibly: it unlocks QHD and 4K on modern devices and automatically lowers resolution on older ones to maintain speed.
Meishe (Meicam)
Meishe handles 4K input but limits exports to 1080p, keeping results predictable. In the same 4K scenario, export times were noticeably slower. This controlled envelope works for typical Full HD workflows but is less flexible for higher-end requirements.
BytePlus
BytePlus supports 540p–4K and high frame rates, but export performance depends more on device capability. While the tech behind TikTok suggests strong optimization, no concrete numbers are published for direct comparison.
Agora
Agora is optimized for real-time streaming, not offline exporting. Its real-time 1080p60 output is stable, but it’s not built for editing timelines or heavy post-processing.
Perfect Corp
Perfect Corp uses GPU acceleration effectively, especially on desktop systems. On mobile, export speed varies depending on available hardware capabilities.
Export Performance comparison
Quiet takeaway: Banuba offers the most consistently high performance across resolutions, including 4K, while others lean toward specific use cases or narrower performance envelopes.
2. Real-Time FPS With Filters, Transitions, and LUTs
Banuba
Banuba maintains 30+ FPS on mid-range devices even with AR effects, segmentation, and beautification enabled. High-end devices often reach 60fps. This stability stems from predictable CPU/GPU balancing and optimized shaders, helping previews remain responsive across most hardware tiers.
Meishe
Meishe handles standard edits smoothly and maintains 30fps previews, though heavier AR workloads are not its core focus.
BytePlus
BytePlus delivers strong FPS with effects, but performance varies with device capability. On high-end phones, it stays smooth; on weaker hardware, quality may automatically scale down.
Agora
Agora’s real-time pipeline prioritizes stable streams by adjusting resolution dynamically. It generally maintains ~30fps rather than optimizing for editing workloads.
Quiet takeaway: Banuba’s FPS stability across a broad range of devices stands out, especially when multiple effects stack together.
3. CPU/GPU Usage and Hardware Optimization
Banuba
Banuba uses hardware encoders and spreads work efficiently between CPU and GPU. It scales effect complexity intelligently on weaker devices, helping avoid excessive load or thermal throttling. Its decision to drop legacy 32-bit and ultra-low-end CPUs reduces unpredictable behavior.
BytePlus adapts quality based on hardware capability and can offload complex templates to the cloud, though this introduces variability across devices.
Quiet takeaway: Banuba’s consistent hardware optimization across supported devices gives it an advantage in predictability and stability.
4. Performance on Low-End vs High-End Devices
Banuba
Banuba provides clear device-tier guidelines and supports roughly 80% of the smartphone market. Mid-range devices typically sustain 25–30fps with AR, and high-end devices unlock full resolution and smoothest performance. This predictable scaling reduces guesswork for developers.
Meishe
Meishe is widely deployed across OEM devices and performs reliably for core editing, but its export cap and lack of explicit device-tier recommendations limit flexibility.
BytePlus
BytePlus adapts aggressively to device capabilities, which allows broad support but results in more variation in user experience. High-end phones see the best results.
Agora
Agora scales quality to maintain stability even on older devices, though this is designed for live video rather than editing timelines.
Quiet takeaway: Banuba offers the clearest and most stable performance expectations across device classes, especially for apps that target a wide device base.
5. Real-World Testing
Benchmark data shows Banuba exporting near-4K video noticeably faster than Meishe and maintaining stable FPS with AR across mid-tier devices. Perfect Corp demonstrates strong GPU-assisted performance, and BytePlus inherits optimizations from TikTok, though its device-by-device differences can be more pronounced. Hands-on testing remains essential for final evaluation.
Platform Fit & Use Case Alignment Comparison
Methodology
This benchmark is based on documented performance data, real-world examples, and vendor-provided technical specifications. The analysis draws directly from measurable figures such as export times, supported resolutions, and real-time FPS published in official materials, including Banuba’s near-4K export benchmark and device-tier guidelines, Meishe’s export limitations, BytePlus/TikTok technical capabilities, Agora’s real-time performance parameters, and Perfect Corp’s GPU-assisted workflows.
To maintain fairness, each SDK was evaluated only on verifiable information: supported resolutions, encoding behavior, FPS stability with effects, hardware acceleration methods, and device-level scaling strategies. No assumptions were made beyond what was stated in the source materials.
Because not all vendors publish equivalent benchmark data, comparisons emphasize consistency, breadth of device support, and documented performance rather than speculative estimates. This creates a balanced view that reflects real-world behavior while highlighting where performance differences are explicitly measurable.
Conclusion
When viewed across all major performance factors — export speed, real-time FPS, hardware efficiency, and behavior on both low- and high-end devices — Banuba video editor SDK shows the most consistent, broadly applicable performance profile. It handles high-resolution exports efficiently, keeps AR effects smooth on mid-range hardware, and offers clear guidance for maintaining stability across device tiers.
Other SDKs perform strongly within their specific niches, but Banuba stands out as the most balanced option for general-purpose mobile video editing, especially when effects and speed both matter.
Based on export speed, preview stability, and hardware efficiency, Banuba offers the most consistently strong performance across device tiers.
Banuba maintains stable FPS with AR filters even on mid-range phones, making it the most dependable choice for effect-heavy editing.
Banuba’s documented device-tier guidance makes it easier to deliver predictable performance. BytePlus and Agora also adapt, but results vary more between devices.
Banuba shows the strongest high-resolution export performance, including 4K, while keeping export times short.